Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work lawyer who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely deceptive term to utilize in this . When you think about a buyout, there’s normally some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe caution. There are no guarantees consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful since leaving earlier than meant can have severe repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for people who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is really generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who like their job. They enjoy the objective of the company. They strive. And right now, they’re dealing with really hard options, especially if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, referall.us is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not sure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy companies to offer this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the stage for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site regards to use and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final type and might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.